Maybe itai??i??s the lack of organic revenue growth. Or the low cost to borrow money. Most likely the combination of the two, but we have seen a spate of merger and acquisition activity of late.
The most high profile has been AT&Tai??i??s (T) $80 billion takeover of Time Warner (TWX) but others in just the past week included Rockwell Collins (COL)said on Monday its $6.4 billion acquisition of interiors maker B/E Aerospace , Toronto-Dominion Bank, TD Ameritrade’s (AMTD) biggest shareholder, said it had agreed to buy Scottrade’s banking business for $ billion.
All told October is shaping up to be the most active month of M&A since 2003.Ai?? And many expect the number of deals to accelerate heading into the end of the year.
Each deal comes various specifics from the form of payment cash/stock, the premium offered, to regulatory hurdles that can impact the time frame to closing.Ai?? Ai??Trying to capitalize on a broad trend of M&A by simply buying call options is basically throwing darts.
You may hit a bullai??i??s eye but unless you are an expert, or have some special knowledge, it will usually take a lot of throws.Ai?? Ai??Letai??i??s look how options can be used to take a more conservative approach to capturing value if a merger does occur and minimize the losses if it doesnai??i??t.
This options strategy will let you speculate on takeovers while minimizing the risk.
Selling the Calendar Spread
The approach Iai??i??m taking is an atypical use of a calendar, or time spread.Ai?? Some quick definitions:
- A calendar spread consists of buying and selling calls (or puts) with different expiration dates.
- If the near term option is sold and the longer dated purchased, usually for a debit, this is considered being long the spread. It is mostly employed on the expectation of a gradual move higher or lower in stock price.Ai?? The notion being that the sale of the near term option helps finances the cost of the longer dated option.
- A diagonal calendar spread refers to using two different strike prices to gain a more directional bias. Typically this would involve buying a longer dated closer to the money options and selling the near term further out of the money option.Ai?? This approach cost money or is done for a debit and its profitability is dependent on clearing that cost basis.
For a potential takeover play we are going to turn these typical approaches on their head.Ai?? That is; buy a lower strike call and sell a longer dated higher strike call.Ai?? This strategy will be done for a credit and will profit if a takeover is reached regardless of the price.
The reasoning is that once a deal is announced and agreed upon all options will approach their intrinsic value. The concept is that once a deal occurs all options across all expirations will drop in implied volatility essentially losing their time premium, and be valued at intrinsic value.
Meaning the time premium of the longer dated calls will evaporate given the upside potential of the stock has been eliminated.Ai??Ai?? Letai??i??s look at an example that will allow us to focus on the numbers and reasoning for using such an approach.
One of name that is constantly the subject of takeover speculation is cyber security firm FireEye (FEYE). Ai??A few months ago management even went as far to say they had turned down not one but several offers in the $30 per share range.Ai?? With the stock now sitting below $13 maybe they should have taken the bid.
Letai??i??s assume someone does come back to the table with a $15-$17 bid– a full 30% to 50% premium from bid from the current price– within the next 6 months.Ai?? How might we play that?
I would look at buying the June 12 call and sell the January 2017 17Ai?? call for a $2.00 net debit.
If the company get bought for any price above $17 the spread will go to a maximum value of $5 for a $3.00 or 150% gain.
The worst scenario would be if share price merely meandered between $12 and $17 leading into the June expiration. For this reason I would exit the position by the end of May no matter what.
By selling a diagonal calendar spread for a credit one can take advantage of a takeover or merger without having to predict the exact price or timing.
Steve Smith is an expert options trader with 25 years experience in the markets. Steve was a seat-holder of the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and the Chicago Board Option Exchange (CBOE) from 1989 ai??i?? 1997. Steve is currently the editor of The Option Specialist and runs the 20K Portfolio Program which provides all types of options trades for all types of traders.
*Editorial Contributors’ Disclaimer
The information contained within this article solely reflects the opinion and analysis about the performance of securities, investments and financial markets by the writer whose articles appear on this site. The views expressed by the writer are not necessarily the views of Weiss Educational Services, its affiliates or members of its management. While Weiss Educational Services and its affiliates accept editorial content from outside contributors, the content provided herein has not been independently verified for its accuracy. Nothing contained in this article is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Information provided on the website is for educational purposes only. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Weiss Educational Services writers, its affiliates and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer’s business or fund. Weiss Educational Services, its affiliates, management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting personalized investment advice.